| Author |
Message |
|
lightsout
|
Post subject:  Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:02 pm |
|
 |
| Old School Member |
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Virginia, US.
|
|
You tell me, as I don't know why he was arrested.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:52 pm |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
|
Arresting law breaking stupid dude with rights was the cops primary function.
Pitching unsigned ticket in the car of law breaking stupid dude with rights in a professional manner was not it.
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightsout
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:46 pm |
|
|
| Old School Member |
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Virginia, US.
|
|
And he was tazed because?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pieter
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:28 pm |
|
|
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:48 am
Posts: 1434
Location: same place as before :)
|
he had "taze me" written al over his forehead  _________________ Opera best browser made by mankind! Linux 2.6.27.7-9-x86_64 SUSE LINUX 11.1KDE: 4.1.3
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:34 am |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
|
Stupidity...
If the law breaking dude was too stupid to comply and obey multiple commands multiple times by the cops, they will use other means than in-effective useless words.
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightsout
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:18 pm |
|
|
| Old School Member |
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Virginia, US.
|
Quote: The UHP's policy governing the use of a Taser does not permit an officer to use it against someone who is merely non-cooperative; the subject must pose some kind of threat to himself, the officer, or innocent bystanders in order for a Taser attack to be justified.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:28 pm |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
lightsout wrote: Quote: The UHP's policy governing the use of a Taser does not permit an officer to use it against someone who is merely non-cooperative; the subject must pose some kind of threat to himself, the officer, or innocent bystanders in order for a Taser attack to be justified. When cops came knocking on your car window, they came with one hand resting on their holsters. They didn't do so because there was no risk to their well being.
Repetitive useless verbal communications to law breaking stupid treestumps on the side of the road is a risk to their well being.
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SS84
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:45 pm |
|
|
| Old School Member |
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:46 am
Posts: 161
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
|
|
Dude's wife seemed to be more of a threat to the officer then the dude himself
_________________
"Black holes are where God divided by zero" - Steven Wright
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:01 am |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
SS84 wrote: Dude's wife seemed to be more of a threat to the officer then the dude himself
"But your honor...
At the time I was distressed and emotionally unstable, obviously this allowed me to disobey and to interfere with the cops performing their duty."
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightsout
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:06 pm |
|
|
| Old School Member |
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Virginia, US.
|
nam ng wrote: When cops came knocking on your car window, they came with one hand resting on their holsters. They didn't do so because there was no risk to their well being.
Yeah, but after 30 seconds was he a threat? He was arguing, but not a threat. Or should the cop just do a preemptive strike with the taser just to be sure?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:08 pm |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
lightsout wrote: nam ng wrote: When cops came knocking on your car window, they came with one hand resting on their holsters. They didn't do so because there was no risk to their well being. Yeah, but after 30 seconds was he a threat? He was arguing, but not a threat. Or should the cop just do a preemptive strike with the taser just to be sure? The law breaking stupid dude with rights could talked and argued for however long he wanted to as long as he obeyed the cops commands.
But the law breaking stupid dude with rights lacked receiving communication skill, showing no sign or ability to receive multiple verbal communications from the cops to maintain order and safety.
The woman was told to get back in the car because she was a THREAT to order and safety of the cops.
Repetitive useless verbal communications to law breaking stupid treestumps on the side of the road is a THREAT to the cops well being.
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightsout
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:28 pm |
|
|
| Old School Member |
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:40 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Virginia, US.
|
nam ng wrote: The woman was told to get back in the car because she was a THREAT to order and safety of the cops.
Why wasn't she tazed then?
But lol, in order to maintain safety you taze someone and make them fall to the tarmac uncontrollably and potentially into the road. Nice!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:16 pm |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
lightsout wrote: Why wasn't she tazed then? The woman didn't obey verbal communications very well but she did get back in the car. lightsout wrote: But lol, in order to maintain safety you taze someone and make them fall to the tarmac uncontrollably and potentially into the road. Nice!
The cops did a very good job, THREAT to order and safety neutralized.
No one got hurt except the THREAT to order and safety. But don't worry the law breaking stupid dude would not bear the hurt alone, I'm sure there 're plenty others who will cry, shed a tear or two for his pain and suffering. The world had no lack for stupidity. 
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Muppet
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:12 pm |
|
|
| Advanced Member |
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 60
|
|
You haven't answered why the guy was being arrested.
An officer can't arrest somebody for a misdemeanor without an arrest warrant.
Or are you saying the guy committed a felony?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nam ng
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:16 pm |
|
|
| Member |
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04 pm
Posts: 21
|
|
"Salt Lake civil rights attorney Brian Barnard agreed police do have the right to arrest a driver who does not sign a speeding ticket. "
They would arrest the law breaking stupid dude even if Brian Barnard didn't agree with it.
_________________
The Sole Idiot with V5's FSAA = RGMS guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
